Professor Keenan joined the University of Illinois College of Law faculty in 2001. He is an expert in human rights and international law, and he holds campus appointments not only at the College of Law but also at the Center for Global Studies, Center for African Studies, and the Lemann Center for Brazilian Studies. He has published articles and book chapters on a variety of issues, including the U.S. drone program, human trafficking and tourism, and international criminal law and conflict minerals, and he is the co-author of “The International Criminal Court in a Nutshell.” His work has appeared in leading law reviews, and he has been quoted in numerous prominent media outlets. Professor Keenan’s scholarship has also been cited in the United States Supreme Court and other federal courts. Prior to his time in academia, Professor Keenan defended indigent criminal defendants facing the death penalty in Georgia and Alabama at trial, on appeal, and in habeas proceedings as an attorney with the Southern Center for Human Rights. His full bio is available on his faculty profile page.

Professor Keenan’s endowed position was made possible through the thoughtful planning and a generous estate donation of Albert E. Jenner, Jr. ’30 in honor of Dean Harno. Dean Albert J. Harno served as a Professor of Law at the University of Illinois from 1921-1957 and was the dean of the College from 1922-1957, overseeing the College’s move from Altgeld Hall to the current College of Law building in 1955. At the campus level, he served as University Provost from 1931-1944.  Dean Harno was also one of the leading scholars in the field of criminal law, producing a critical chapter entitled “The Supreme Court, In Felony Cases” in the 1929 Illinois Crime Survey, along with bringing forth the texts, “Sentencing and Parole in Illinois” and “Cases and Materials on Criminal Law and Procedure.” 

Watch the full investiture ceremony on our YouTube page.

The program currently applies to nearly 200 commonly used medications, including treatments for conditions such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and depression. State officials say the goal is to improve medication adherence. After an initial review period of 250 cases by a physician, the AI system will begin making prescription renewal decisions without direct human oversight.

While the authors agree that “autonomous prescription renewal may offer benefits in narrowly defined clinical contexts,” they focus on several medical and legal issues raised by the program, including:

• Risks when the system is used for medications requiring frequent dose adjustments or in patients whose clinical status could change rapidly.
• Whether Doctronic problematically failed to seek FDA premarket authorization for the AI system as a medical device.
• Whether AI-based prescribing is an instance of “misbranding” carrying potential civil or criminal penalties, because prescribing must be done by “a practitioner licensed by law to administer such drug.”

The article also discusses the complex relationship between state and federal law at play in such autonomous AI systems. “Such systems hold a lot of potential benefit for patients,” said I. Glenn Cohen, a Professor and Deputy Dean at Harvard Law School and one of the article’s authors, “but especially as the first-in-the-nation, it is important for patients that the developers consider all the legal and ethical issues raised.”

Read the full article at nejm.org.

The pair wrote that they don’t believe the ruling will impact Utah’s own law banning conversion therapy. An excerpt follows:

“Unlike Colorado’s law, Utah’s legislation is viewpoint-neutral. Rather than dictating conversation, Utah’s law protected virtually everything a therapist would want to explore with a minor client through “safe harbors.” Therapists can talk with kids about body image, family dynamics, social media use, religious beliefs or risky behaviors — and children can raise doubts, fears or questions — without being funneled into a single script of affirmation. Destructive aversive practices remain banned — but dialogue, exploration and honesty are protected.”

Read the full op-ed at deseret.com.

Professor Jason Mazzone, constitutional law expert, expected far more aggressive questioning of both sides. Speaking to the New York Times, he said, “I kept having to remind myself that I was listening to a Supreme Court oral argument rather than presentation of papers at an academic conference before a polite audience of scholars willing to engage with whatever eccentric idea was being presented.”

“My conclusion from the content and tone of the argument is that there is a majority — possibly even nine justices — already persuaded that the executive order violates the 1952 statute,” he said, “and so the 14th Amendment argument didn’t need the sort of probing that would be required in another case that turned solely on a constitutional issue.”

Read the full story at nytimes.com.

Read the full story at Inside Higher Ed.

Robin Kar, a professor of law and philosophy and associate dean for curricular innovation at the College of Law, received the Outstanding Faculty Leadership Award. This award recognizes faculty members who have provided extraordinary leadership contributions across many dimensions of shared governance that advance the excellence of a unit, a college and/or the campus, and who exemplify the campus commitment to collaborative decision-making. The award is the highest accolade honoring a faculty member whose professional service has advanced progress toward the Illinois mission.

Kar has garnered several key leadership roles for the Urbana campus and the University of Illinois System, acting as a compass for the development and adoption of meaningful shared governance. These roles include serving as interim head of the Department of Philosophy for three years, chair of the Senate Executive Committee for three years, chair and vice chair of the of the University Senate for two years and chair of the Committee on Faculty Sexual Misconduct for one year. Kar established a style of leadership in the Department of Philosophy grounded in impartiality and open communication. He was credited with hiring and retaining philosophy professors that restored the department into a top 50 program globally and elevated it into the intellectually vibrant community that it is today. Kar was also cited for his initial work in 2018 in updating systemwide policies regarding sexual harassment, sexual assault and other forms of sexual misconduct and remains a trusted voice as those matters are continuously monitored. His approach to leadership — amid navigating complex problems — rests on listening to different and sometimes opposing perspectives and then “working creatively to harmonize them.” Kar’s record of shared governance is now being applied to his current leadership role as the inaugural associate dean for curricular innovation in the College of Law.

Read the full campus press release.