Richard J. Ross
David C. Baum Professor of Law and Professor of History
Director, Program in Legal History
Richard Ross holds a joint appointment in the College of Law and History Department at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and is co-director of the Illinois Program in Legal History. He currently offers courses on trusts and estates, property, American legal history, the rule of law, and the legal cultures of early America. Before coming to Illinois in 2004, he had a joint appointment in the law school and history department of the University of Wisconsin (Madison), where he helped set up the Legal Studies Program.
Ross’ research has dealt with several themes:
(1) The Development of Early American Law in a Comparative Context: He is currently working on: The Beginnings of American Law: A Comparative History (under contract, Yale University Press) (with Steven Wilf). The book examines the origins of American law (c.1600-1820) with one eye on the Spanish New World empire and the other eye on British Ireland. The comparative approach can particularly illuminate how America came to see itself as a law-centered society. Central to this project is the notion of legal pluralism and the legal relations of settlers and indigenous peoples. Ross has explored both of these themes in edited volumes. With Brian Owensby, he has co-edited, Justice in British, Iberian, and Indigenous America, 1600-1825: The Challenge of Legal Intelligibility (in press, forthcoming from NYU Press in 2017). The volume considers how, in British and Iberian America, settler law and its associated notions of justice became intelligible to indigenous peoples, and vice versa. Before colonists and Natives could meaningfully try to learn from, outmaneuver, resist, or accommodate each other, they had to grasp something of their interlocutors’ legal principles and conceptions of justice. Ross has co-edited with Lauren Benton a volume of essays, entitled, Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500-1850 (NYU Press, July 2013). This project illuminates the meaning and provenance of the concept of legal pluralism. And it explores how the legal pluralism so marked in overseas European empires influenced claims about sovereignty, the role of conquered subjects and religious minorities, and the development of inter-imperial relations.
(2) The Political and Intellectual History of Legal Communications: Representative articles include: “Legal Communications and Imperial Governance: British North America and Spanish America Compared,” in Cambridge History of Law in America, Volume 1: Early America (1580-1815), ed. Christopher L. Tomlins and Michael Grossberg (Cambridge, 2008), 104-143; and “The Memorial Culture of Early Modern English Lawyers: Memory as Keyword, Shelter, and Identity, 1560-1640,” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 10 (1998): 229-326, which received the honorable mention for the 1999 Sutherland Prize from the American Society for Legal History.
(3) The Intertwined Influence of Law and Religion on Governance: Representative articles include: “Puritan Godly Discipline in Comparative Perspective: Legal Pluralism and the Sources of ‘Intensity,’” American Historical Review 113 (2008): 975-1002; “Binding in Conscience: Early Modern English Protestants and Spanish Thomists on Law and the Fate of the Soul,” Law and History Review 33 (2015): 803-37; and “Distinguishing Eternal from Transient Law: Natural Law and the Judicial Laws of Moses,” Past and Present 217 (2012): 79-115, which received the 2013 Carroll P. Hurd Award for Excellence in Faculty Scholarship from the University of Illinois College of Law.
Ross has earned three degrees from Yale University: BA in 1984; JD in 1989 from Yale Law School, where he was symposium editor and senior editor of the Yale Law Journal; and PhD in history in 1998. He has received research fellowships from Yale Law School, Yale’s Institute for Social and Policy Studies, the American Historical Association, the Institute for Research in the Humanities at the University of Wisconsin (Madison), and the Spencer Foundation. He was a visiting scholar at the Harvard History Department (1995-96) and the NYU History Department (spring 2010). He was a visiting professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School (fall 2008 and fall 2009); Hebrew University Law School, Jerusalem, Israel (May 2012); and Tel Aviv University Law School, Israel (May-June 2015).
Ross is the director of the Illinois Legal History Program, and the founder and director of the Symposium on Comparative Early Modern Legal History. Every year or two, the Symposium presents a conference that gathers law professors, historians, and social scientists to explore a particular topic in comparative legal history in the early modern period, broadly defined (c.1492-1815). We traditionally meet at the Newberry Library in Chicago.
BA, JD, PhD Yale University
Areas of Expertise
American legal history
Comparative legal history
American Legal History
Decedents’ Estates and Trusts
Legal Cultures of Early America
“Binding in Conscience: Early Modern English Protestants and Spanish Thomists on Law and the Fate of the Soul,” Law and History Review 33 (2015): 803-37.
“Spanish American and British American Law as Mirrors to Each Other: Implications of the Missing Derecho Británico Indiano,” in New Horizons in Spanish Colonial Law: Contributions to Transnational Early Modern Legal History, ed. Thomas Duve and Heikki Pihlajamäki (Frankfurt: Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, 2015), 9-28.
“Reconstructing Early Modern Notions of Legal Pluralism,” in Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500-1850, ed. Lauren Benton and Richard J. Ross (New York, 2013), 109-41 (with Philip Stern)
“Empires and Legal Pluralism: Jurisdiction, Sovereignty, and Political Imagination in the Early Modern World,” in Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500-1850, ed. Lauren Benton and Richard J. Ross (New York, 2013), 1-17 (with Lauren Benton).
“Distinguishing Eternal from Transient Law: Natural Law and the Judicial Laws of Moses,” Past and Present 217 (2012): 79-115.
“Puritan Godly Discipline in Comparative Perspective: Legal Pluralism and the Sources of ‘Intensity,’” American Historical Review 113 (2008): 975-1002.
“Legal Communications and Imperial Governance: British North America and Spanish America Compared,” in Cambridge History of Law in America, Volume 1: Early America (1580-1815), ed. Christopher L. Tomlins and Michael Grossberg (Cambridge, 2008), 104-143.