The Big Ten Law Schools present Rule of Law in 2025

The Big Ten law schools have coordinated a series of virtual panel discussions that examine the Rule of Law in 2025 after an unprecedented series of executive orders, legal interpretations, and administrative actions by the Trump administration over the last several months. Distinguished panelists will present a broad range of perspectives and nuanced views on the rule of law during a period of constitutional, legal, and governmental recalibration.

Panels will take place on Wednesdays, 4:00 – 5:00 pm (CST) from March 26 to May 28, 2025. Attendees may join virtually: https://law.unl.edu/ruleoflaw/

March 26 | The Ohio State University Moritz School of Law
Rule of Law and Separation of Powers, Part I: Executive Authority and Compliance with Court Orders
Panelists: Danielle Jefferis, Schmid Professor for Excellence in Research, University of Nebraska College of Law; Brandon Johnson, Assistant Professor of Law, University of Nebraska College of Law; Peter Shane, Professor of Law Emeritus, Moritz College of Law; Ilan Wurman, Julius E. Davis Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School; Steve Huefner, C. William O’Neill Professor in Law and Judicial Administration, Moritz College of Law (moderator).


April 2 | Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law
Rule of Law and Separation of Powers, Part II: Executive Authority and the Administrative State
Panelists: Monica Haymond, Assistant Professor of Law, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law; John O. McGinnis, George C. Dix Professor in Constitutional Law, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law; Daniel B. Rodriguez, Harold Washington Professor of Law, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law; James B. Speta, Elizabeth Froehling Horner Professor of Law, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law; Hari M. Osofsky, Dean and Myra and James Bradwell Professor of Law, Professor of Environmental Law and Culture (Courtesy), Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (moderator).


April 9 | Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Rearticulation of Sex and Gender
Panelists: Valena Beety, McKinney Professor of Law, Indiana University Maurer School of Law; Katie Eyer, Professor of Law, Rutgers Law School; Marc Spindelman, Isadore and Ida Topper Professor of Law, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law; Deborah Widiss, John F. “Jack” Kimberling Chair and Professor of Law, Indiana University Maurer School of Law; Christiana Ochoa, Dean and Herman B Wells Professor of Law, Indiana University Maurer School of Law (moderator)


April 16 | Rutgers Law School
International Law and U.S. Threats to Sovereignty
Panelists: Karima Bennoune, Lewis M. Simes Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School; Jean-Marc Coicaud, Distinguished Professor of Law and Global Affairs, Rutgers Law School; Adil Haque, Professor of Law and Judge Jon O. Newman Scholar, Rutgers Law School; Brian Lepard, Harold W. Conroy Distinguished Professor of Law, University of Nebraska College of Law; Sarah Dadush, Professor of Law, Rutgers Law School (moderator)


April 23 | University of Minnesota Law School
Rule of Law and Separation of Powers, Part III: Executive Authority to Enforce the Laws


April 30 | University of Nebraska College of Law and Penn State Dickinson Law
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging as part of the First Amendment and Academic Freedom
Panelists: Erik Girvan, Bernard B. Kliks Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, University of Oregon School of Law; Stacy Hawkins, Professor of Law, Rutgers Law School; John O. McGinnis, George C. Dix Professor in Constitutional Law, Northwestern; University Pritzker School of Law; Danielle Conway, Dean and Donald J. Farage Professor of Law, Penn State Dickinson Law (moderator) and Richard Moberly, Dean and Richard C. & Catherine S. Schmoker Professor of Law, University of Nebraska College of Law (moderator).


May 7 | University of Wisconsin Law School
Citizenship and Immigration


May 14 | University of Oregon School of Law
What is the “Rule of Law”?


May 21 | University of Illinois College of Law
The States’ Role in Protecting the Rule of Law


May 28 | UCLA School of Law
Judicial and Presidential Dismantling of Administrative Capacity

Changes to CFPB will affect the average person, Lawless tells News Bureau

“It’ll just be a steady drip, drip, drip of companies trying to game the system and nickel and dime people via aggressive practices,” Professor Robert Lawless told the Illinois News Bureau about changes to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. He noted that laws preventing actions like those taken by banks preceding the subprime mortgage crisis will still be in effect, but other protections are very much at risk. “Over the long run, it’s going to affect people. It’ll be the frog and the boiling pot of water. It’ll be a steady ratcheting up of unfair practices, and there will be no more cops left to police the beat,” he added.

Mazzone joins CBS to discuss deportations

The Trump administration’s moves to arrest Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil and decision not comply with a federal judge’s orders to halt deportation flights raise questions about the rights enumerated in the Constitution as well as its constraints. Professor Jason Mazzone made an appearance on CBS Chicago to share his expertise on how constitutional law can be applied to these situations.

Ghiotto and Wexler examine the executive order on transgender military members

In a new post on Justia Verdict, Professors Tony Ghiotto and Lesley Wexler do a deep examination of the Prioritizing Military Excellence Order, President Trump’s executive order on transgender individuals in the military. The article seeks to answer whether the order represents a complete transgender service ban or a variation of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” as well as its legal impacts and possible solutions. “The best mechanism to oppose the ban, and to deter future bans, is judicial and will require transgender members to continue leading the efforts for their right to serve,” the authors conclude.

New York Times quotes Thomas on Greenpeace case

In March, a North Dakota jury awarded a Texas-based pipeline company more than $660 million in damages related to protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline. Greenpeace is expected to appeal the decision, in part because of their issue with jurors who had ties to the oil industry. Professor Suja Thomas, an expert in jury trials, told The New York Times North Dakota courts do not use “blanket disqualifications of jurors just because they might have some kind of interest.”

Law.com quotes Aronson on Big Law firms discontinuing immigration work

In the second term of President Donald Trump, several Big Law firms that previously had been eager to support pro bono immigration work are no longer touting their work in that area and may be discontinuing the work. Professor Lauren Aronson, director of the Immigration Law Clinic, spoke to Law.com about this shift, explaining “people are showing…how much pressure they can withstand.”

Wilson reflects on the Utah Compromise a decade later

Ten years ago, Utah passed two pieces of legislation Utah to protect religious freedom and protect LGBT individuals from discrimination in housing and employment. Though it is one of the most conservative states in the United States, the “Utah Compromise” to enact these bills has held up so far and helped increase respect for individuals in the Beehive State. Professor Robin Fretwell Wilson co-authored an editorial for Deseret News examining the impacts of these laws after a decade.

Lawless discusses dismissal of bankruptcy watchdog

Tara Twomey’s tenure as executive director of the U.S. Trustee Program was recently terminated by the Trump administration, drawing criticism from Professor Robert Lawless. In a blog for Credit Slips, Lawless writes that “Under Twomey’s leadership the US Trustee Program did dozens of things that make the system work just a little bit better for the people who need it,” and Bloomberg quoted him as saying the move was “a short-sighted and likely illegal decision.” In a follow-up blog, Lawless also responded to criticism of Twomey and defended her qualifications to work at the Department of Justice.

Read Lawless’s original blog post and follow-up post.

Amar and Mazzone defend birthright citizenship clause

Writing at Justia Verdict, Professors Vikram Amar and Jason Mazzone describe the Fourteenth Amendment as perhaps the most important piece of law enacted anywhere in the world over the last two centuries. In their defense of the birthright citizenship clause, the authors suggest that criticisms of the clause in support of President Trump’s executive order seeking to end the practice are doing “absolute violence to the words of the Clause.”

Aronson does interview on immigrant directives

Speaking to the Institute of Government and Public Affairs, Professor Lauren Aronson, who serves as director of the Immigration Law Clinic, shared her thoughts on recent directives from the Trump administration regarding undocumented immigrants and explains how they may impact Illinois law. “I have deep concerns over the current immigration climate. While immigrants are the primary target, they warned that the federal government’s overreach could eventually extend to other groups, not just immigrants,” she explained.

College of Law
504 East Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
(217) 333-0931